I must be missing something.  According to most online news sources as well as the network evening news, many Americans are angry about the cover of the latest issue of Rolling Stone magazine which features the face of surviving Boston bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.  The angry folks are saying that Rolling Stone is giving this creep the “rock star treatment.”  Oh really?  The headline below Tsnarv face poses the question how did this guy……..turn into a monster? Did Rolling Stone suggest he was anything but a monster?

Would you say that all publications that publish the faces of the most notorious criminals in our society are guilty of giving them the rock star treatment?  Of course not.  So WTF is really going on here?

Is the real problem which is making people uncomfortable the fact that this murderer happens to be handsome?   If that’s the case let’s all just take a deep breath, acknowledge that fact and demand that in the future publications only publish the faces of real sicko-creepy looking criminals like Charlie Manson. 

How many publications do you think gave ol’Charlie the “rock star treatment” 44 years ago?